Monday, April 27, 2020
Essay Topics on Culture - Essay Topics on Culture
Essay Topics on Culture - Essay Topics on CultureWhen writing an essay on culture, you can't ignore the importance of issues relating to the world that surround you. Today, the topics are sometimes more diverse than ever, and this article discusses some of the factors that will help you write an essay on culture with ease.There are a number of essay topics on culture that you may choose from when writing your essays. These include different forms of spirituality, the history of art, the nature of science, the role of politics in a society, and the place of the arts and humanities in modern society. Each of these topics has specific themes that you must keep in mind when writing your essay.Religion is the most obvious topic to discuss, since it plays such a large role in all areas of life. Religion is also a very complex subject, and many different perspectives exist on it. For example, a group of religious scholars might consider that religion is simply an important part of our human condition, while others may consider that religion serves as a tool for societal control. Since religion is such a prominent part of our lives, it is necessary to carefully consider the views of people who claim to know the truth.Culture is perhaps the most confusing topic to deal with. What is culture? Is it just anything that is an expression of the society? Or is it a set of values, beliefs, and ways of life that have developed over time? If you are writing an essay on culture, then you should make sure that you carefully research the origin of a culture.One aspect of culture that cannot be disputed is the importance of art. Art is the basic artistic expression of a culture, and it is a big part of how that culture creates its worldview. Art is a social construct and is therefore highly subjective. With that said, you should choose your topic carefully so that you don't fall into the trap of using it to support a personal opinion.Science is the next topic to consider, because it can only be understood by studying the culture that created it. Take for example the study of the DNA code. The genetics of a species is inextricably tied to the evolution of their human environment. When analyzing the effect of a culture, you need to use methods that show the effects of those cultures to have had an impact on human history.It is often not easy to come up with essay topics on culture. There are so many of them that it can be difficult to determine which ones are appropriate. One good thing about writing on culture is that the topic of your essay is rarely easy to write about. However, it is a topic that can be developed into many different topics through the development of an essay.
Saturday, April 18, 2020
SUV Instability Essay Example For Students
SUV Instability Essay The Instability of Sport Utility VehiclesAs the ambulance slowly pulls away from the accident, a police officer stops to ponder how different this crash was from all the others in which a Sport Utility Vehicle was involved. He realizes it is no different at all. SUVs are the leaders in rollover crashes in the United States which includes all vehicles of make and model. They have been around for an extremely long time but, so have their problems. However, there were no problems actually documented due to the incredible instability of the cars during the first time period in which SUVs were created. Although extremely popular and useful, Sport Utility Vehicles are extremely dangerous and highly susceptible to roll over in sharp turns and high speeds. Reasons for such crashes include things like high ranking executives ignoring engineers warnings about the potential hazard of the vehicles, and high speeds mixing with sharp turns. Also, over- and/or under- inflated tires on a top-heavy, high-centered vehicle. Sport Utility Vehicles are extremely popular. A few reasons are for their all-terrain capabilities, the feeling of safety people have while their driving them, and their seating capacity. However, it is also for these reasons they are unstable. The false feeling of safety leads people to be careless while driving them, and/or leads people to feel in charge of the road thereby creating a higher chance of an accident or rollover. We will write a custom essay on SUV Instability specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The history of the Sport Utility Vehicle and its unique problems with rolling over in high speed fast reaction situations starts almost at the beginning of the car. According to John D. Pietro, the Suburban was introduced way back in 1936, the Chevrolet (and GMC) Suburban was based on a commercial panel truck, but instead of having a huge, windowless cargo area there was a large passenger compartment (The History). The early makers of General Motor Company, (GMC), saw potential in building a vehicle which could carry more people and still be useful in big jobs such as construction. GMC was the first company to build an SUV. The title of the first SUV and/or high capacity vehicle maker, however, is still up for debate. Such a part in the debate is in 1934, the name was shortened to Westchester Suburban and Dodge was selling them to the army (The History). Such statements started the debate on who had the first SUV. Dodge claimed their wagons to be the Westchester Suburban whereas, GMC and Chevrolet claimed the title Suburban. In 1956:Power was on the rise again as much as 205 horsepower was produced by Chevrolets small-block V8. GMC followed suit with its six-cylinder engine (now at 270 cubic inch) putting out 130 horsepower as well as its V8 (now at 317 cubic inch) pumping out 180 ponies. The big news this year was the introduction of four-wheel drive for the GMC, and it could be had with either the six- or the eight-cylinder engine. (The History)The Suburban was the original reason for SUV rollovers that are now known. It was the first to have 4-wheel drive capability and there for, made it easier to roll than two-wheel drive trucks. However dangerous, they are still popular mainly because of their versatility and look. Also, they are very helpful for mothers or fathers to use for taking their kids to something like soccer games and football games and being able to carry more than just their child or children and instead fitting something like 5-6 kids in thei r vehicles. According to SUVRollovers.com,:SUV popularity created a large increase in sales in the 1990s, and because there was so much consumer demand for these cars, carmakers continued to manufacture SUVs. Because the vehicle has changed from simply being an off-road vehicle to a family car, manufacturers have also removed the roll bar that protects drivers and passengers in a rollover situation. (SUVrollovernews.com)This is the main reason for their continually growing popularity. Although SUVs are somewhat hard on gas mileage and are not the most economic cars on the road, people enjoy them because they can take bumps in the road and hold a higher number of people. Thereby, creating a useful tool for commuting, whether it be on a farm or to a metropolis. But, there are many dangers in both driving and owning an SUV. One instance of a danger occurred when all Ford Bronco IIs were found to be dangerously unstable and Ford executives had ignored warnings from their own engineers (Lisante). The Bronco II posed a danger to the driver of the vehicle and to the other drivers on the road. The executives at Ford decided to not listen to their own engineers and proceeded with production. The Bronco II was not the only vehicle Ford had problems with. During testing of the Explorer a recent federal scorecard that gives a fully-loaded Explorer the worst rollover rating one star out of a possible five (Lisante). Again Ford executives proceeded with manufacturing a dangerous and unstable vehicle. They put safety aside in order to make money. These SUVs although still manufactured, are exceptionally unstable and dangerous to have on the road. Ford was one of the first companies to have trouble between engineers and designers and executives who were just in it to make a quick buck on the average typical soccer mom. Ignorant people are not the only causes of crashes and rollovers involving Sport Utility Vehicles. According to writer James R. Healey of the USA Today newspaper, in a multiple-vehicle crash, you get hit by another car and might roll over. Thats not an unstable vehicle (Healey). Rollovers are not just caused by unstable vehicles. There is always the chance of outstanding circumstances in any collision. On the other hand, James Grimaldi and Cindy Skrzycki of the Sun Times report, Firestone, primarily concerned about stresses placed on under inflated tires, has set 30 psi (pounds per square inch) as optimal. Fords 26 psi reflects its concern about stability (Grimaldi and Skrzycki). Conflicting reports can easily confuse an owner into an unavoidable accident. Some facts are not all they are shown to be. Consumer Reports magazine in a test of SUVs found, (we) tested seven SUVs on the same day, May 16. During those tests the only vehicle to tip up was the 2001 Mitsubishi Montero Limited. A well known and respected testing facility found an SUV to be unsafe. Although the odds of one in seven are pretty good, thats still too many. Upon an investigation of the Ford Company internal documents indicate Ford wanted a wider 245-centimeter tire on the Explorer for styling and marketing reasons, since bigger tires are regarded as more macho. But at a May 1989 test at Fords Arizona Proving Grounds, an Explorer equipped with the wider tires lifted two wheels off the ground in a sharp turn (Lisante). Ford again ignored blatant results that were presented to them in black and white. They manufactured the Explorers anyway. There is never only one reason for accidents and rollovers involving SUVs. .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 , .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 .postImageUrl , .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 , .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625:hover , .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625:visited , .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625:active { border:0!important; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625:active , .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625 .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uea67b6247dd1a4e0600ca050e0f7d625:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Patriot act Essay ThesisThe chances of a rollover are greatly increased while driving an SUV. Approximately, 2,000 people would still be alive, if their vehicle had been hit by a heavy car instead of an SUV (SUVs: Escalating Risk). Due to SUVs, the driver fatality rate in multiple vehicle collisions has greatly increased. If people know of these staggering statistics, the fatality/collision rating can go down. It is then possible for more people to have the knowledge not to trust in these rolling boxes of death. In addition to SUV accidents, light trucks crashing into cars accounts for the majority of fatalities in vehicle-to-vehicle collisions (SUVs: Escalating Risk). SUV s, although not the leading cause, do cause a number of accidental fatalities. There is another reason for the high death toll of crashes. According to the National Highway Safety Administration, the government agency studying the safety of Sport Utility Vehicles, describes two characteristics of SUVs and other light trucks that have the potential to increase fatalities: rollover propensity and crash compatibility (SUVs: Escalating Risk). There are two major concerns to the government involving the frequency of rollovers and general crashes of SUVs. The government has become worried enough to devote an entire agency to study SUVs and light trucks. Dr. R. David Pittle, the Senior vice President of Consumer Reports reported the other vehicles that are most popular, and had fatal rollover scores roughly similar to Explorers: Subaru Legacy and outback station wagon, Oldsmobile Achieva, Chevrolet Cavalier, Pontiac Grand Am, Dodge and Plymouth Neon, Chrysler LHS and Ford Crown Victoria, ( Pittle). Not only SUVs have a high rollover rating. The Ford Explorer is not the only SUV with a high rollover score, the Subaru Outback and Legacy had the same ratings. James Grimaldi and Cindy Skrzycki of the Sun Times explain, sport-utility vehicles are more prone than cars to tip over because of their high center of gravity. The reason for rollovers is actually quite easy to understand. The rollover rating has the potential to be much higher than it already is. They also report, the Ford Explorer with fully inflated tires could roll over when making sudden turns The possibility of a rollover is always there even with a standard direction like inflating your tires. Proper driving techniques such as leaving space or planning a trip can lead to safe driving and lower rollover percents. They go on to say Explorer would fail the tests when equipped with tires inflated to the maximum 35 pounds per square inch (Grimaldi and Skrazycki). The maximum amount is not always the best thing. T he Explorer had many problems with their design. Consumer Reports also explains taller vehicles such as SUVs have a higher center of gravity, which makes them more top-heavy and more susceptible to rolling over than lower vehicles such as sedans (Pittle). Again, there is a simple and singular explanation for the high rates and percentages of SUV rollovers. Thanks to people not knowing a simple equation, height plus width equals stabilization, SUVs greatly increase the risk of rollover. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Solomon) rollovers occur in 8% of all crashes and cause more than 50% of all ejections (Solomon). SUV rollovers dont always have the driver physically in the car at the time of the crash. They also account for a half of the entire driver ejection statistic. The CDC also found ejections are also more likely to occur in Sport Utility Vehicles (Solomon). Yet another government agency found SUVs to be a cause of high injury risk. Not only do SUVs tip easily, they also have a higher potential than most cars to eject the driver of the vehicle out in a crash type situation. In tests, Sport Utility Vehicles lifted two wheels off the ground fairly often, this resulting in rollovers on the road and numerous amounts of money spent on settlements and cases. According to Consumer Reports the Trooper at 39.4 mph, lifted its two right wheels slightly at the same section of the track where the red Montero had tipped (Pittle). More than one SUV tipped at the same point of track. Consumer Reports did a lot of testing and more than enough research to back up their findings. They went on to say a short-course double-lane change emergency-avoidance maneuver the Montero Limited, in 8 out of 9 runs at or faster than 36.7 mph, tipped up on two wheels during a sharp right turn (Pittle) Consumer Reports, again, went above and beyond the regular tests in order to test safety. They were not at all biased in their reports on any vehicles, despite what some companies may have reported in their lawsuits against them. Tab Turner, attorney to Don Bailey; a woman permanently hurt due to a rollover accident, settled a total of 11 cases of rollovers for a total of $11.5 million in six weeks (Lisante). There are a large number of people suing for cases of rollovers against big companies. Most people win because of mistakes on the dealers fault. Also according to this document, as of 1995, Ford had settled at least 334 Bronco II rollover cases, paying out more than $113 million (Lisante). A lot of SUV owners are going for a lawsuit against the maker of their SUV. Some people care enough about themselves to try and go after the big fish. Such SUV tests can help save lives and money by focusing more on the rollover capability factor. These rollovers and crashes dont come without their own statistics and opinions from driver to auto-maker and from auto-maker to drivers. Such a statistic of complaints to auto-makers is 80% of car and SUV owners strongly suggest that automakers should make safety changes to SUVs that would make the roads safer for car occupants (SUV s: Escalating Risk). The owners and drivers of SUVs want changes. But, in addition to them, the owners and drivers of just cars want changes to SUVs too. In 1996 rollover crashes accounted for 53% of all SUV occupant deaths in single vehicle crashes (SUVs: Escalating Risk). SUVs, even back then, were incredibly unstable. Since then, more teenagers have modified and built up their SUVs and made the center of gravity higher in turn making SUVs easier to roll over. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says SUVs rollover in 37% of fatal crashes, compared to 15% rollover rate for passenger cars (SUVs: Escalating Risk). SUVs, while holding more people than most passenger cars, also have a higher chance of killing everyone in the vehicle. Your chance of dying in a rollover is increased at least 22% when you decide to own or drive an SUV. They also say Sport Utility Vehicles are more than three times more likely to rollover in a crash than normal passenger cars (SUVs: Escalati ng Risk). You have a 300% chance of rolling over when you drive an SUV as opposed to a passenger car. Yet another statistic showing the instability of SUVs. The Ford company wasnt the only ones to have deaths with their SUVs, the Subaru Legacy and Outback, for instance, had a low single-vehicle driver death rate18but all involved rollovers, so the instability score was 100% (Healey). There wasnt just one company and or type of vehicle who had problems with instability and driver death rates. The Subaru car company, although very successful in selling their cars and wagons, also had a issues with their vehicles which they describe as well made. The IIHS says the most-popular version of Explorer (59.3% of Explorers in the IIHS analysis) had a driver death rate of 56 and an instability score of 70.3% (Healey). More than just the National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator has found Explorers are a danger to have on the road. Explorers and other Sport Utility Vehicles are probably not worth the risk of having on the road. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also states we are investigating 62 deaths and more than 100 injuries linked to the separation of tread from tires on the Explorers (Grimaldi and Skrzycki). The Explorer was not the only thing responsible for the rollovers but had a large impact in it. There was no real way to know the tires had the chance of separation but still separated. After many tests made by completely different groups of people and different researching companies, the result was the same. SUVs were extremely unstable. As time goes on, the safety of SUVs becomes more and more tolerable. In a recent study done by the American Automobile Association (Van Sickle), the new 2002 Ford Explorer received an average of 4.5 stars in crash tests (Van Sickle). The potential for rollovers has been greatly reduced in recent years. The harm to the drivers and passengers has also been decreased as the vehicles have progressed. AAA also issued the Nissan Pathfinder, Frontier 44, and RWD models three stars in their Rollover Resistance Ratings. These Nissan models have a 20 to 30% chance of rolling over in a crash or in sharp turns at high speeds. The rollover rating, in addition to crash tests, has gone down in frequency of accidents in recent years. This is partially due to higher standards set by the National Highway Traffic Safety Association, who controls which cars are allowed on the road and which are not. Although these advances in the safety of these large bulky vehicles have been made, there is still a false sense of security because of the size of the vehicle. People are trusting too much in their trucks and not being cautious enough while driving one of these. Even with the recent breakthroughs in security, Sport Utility Vehicles are the leaders in rollover crashes in the United States including large passenger vehicles such as vans, and small economic cars such as a Geo Metro or a Toyota Corolla. Althoug h extremely popular and useful, Sport Utility Vehicles are extremely dangerous and highly susceptible to rollover in sharp turns and high speeds. They can lead to large death tolls, rollover settlements and insurance costs. Reasons for such crashes include things like, high ranking executives ignoring engineers warnings about the potential hazard of the vehicles, and high speeds mixing with sharp turns. Also, over and or under inflated tires on a top heavy, high centered vehicle. All these combined with the everyday hazards of normal driving in traffic or high stress situations create a large potential for fatalistic and harm causing incidents. Work Cited: Dipietrom, John. A Chevrolet/GMC/Suburban History. 6 Dec. 2001. 17 Oct. 2002 Grimaldi, James V., and Cindy Skrzycki. SUV instability led to Ford advising low tire pressure. ChicagoSuntimes.com. 21 Aug. 2000. 25 Sept., 2002 Healey, James R.. Crash study ranks deadly vehicles USA Today 23 Oct. 2000: 34The History Of The Suburban, 2 June 2000. 17 Oct. 2002 Lisante, Joan E. Explorer Goes on Trial. ConsumerAffairs.com. 8 Jan. 2001. 25 Sept., 2002. Pittle, R. David. Consumer Reports Responds to Mitsubishi Statements Regarding Its Tests of the 2001 Mitsubishi Montero Limited. Consumersunion.com.21 June 2001.25 Sept. 2002 Solomon, David. Nutz and Boltz Automotive Survival Guide. Chicago: Contemporary Books, 1997SUVrollovernews.com. 17 Oct., 2002SUVs: Escalating Risks On The Highways, SUVSafety.org. 25 Sept., 2002. Van Sickle, Dave. 2002 New Cars and Trucks. Heathrow, Florida: AAA Publishing, 2002.
Saturday, March 14, 2020
Arguments of the Legalization of Marijuana Essays
Arguments of the Legalization of Marijuana Essays Arguments of the Legalization of Marijuana Paper Arguments of the Legalization of Marijuana Paper Essay Topic: Arguments When discussing the legalization of Marijuana, take a mechanistic view of one symptom of a much larger social problem. You cannot talk about legalizing marijuana without getting into discussions of other Social problems. I am talking about all other drugs prostitution, health care, social security, or just about any other issue that we as a country, and as a people are dealing with. For the purposes of this paper, I will confine, or rather use the legalization of marijuana issue as a model for how we can deal with this, as well as other problems that we are correcting as we approach the next millenium. The obvious arguments for legalization that are used, happen to be ones that the masses that make this argument usually resort to the health and environment benefits. One argument that is hardly ever used, however, and the one that I wish to concentrate on, is the fact that the drug problems in this country, as well as the others that are listed above are included in the group of SOICIAL PROBLEMS. Think about that for a minute. What entails? A social problem is a problem that faces a society. Now I want you to think about your society. Not society, but your specific and immediate society. What does it consist of? Whom does it consist of? Immediate answers might be school, neighborhood, church, work, town, and family. In other words, we can define it as your community. Your community is your society, now exclusive of your friends and others you consider to be in your peer group who may actually encourage certain types of Immoral behavior. Who in your community would sit back and let you abuse your body and mind with excessive drug use? Schools would suspend; families could react with everything from tough love to ultimatums. Very rarely is it someone outside of your society that will reach out to you and give that helping hand. Some ex-drug abusers testimony may spark the revelation in you to kick your habit. But it is your community that will help you. You see, put very simply, drug abuse is a Social Problem and more often than not your society will help you or ostracize you, depending of course on your particular situation. Thus, while you may not kick, you would certainly take steps to curb your habit from becoming obvious or debilitating to your life. Now what does this have to do with legalization? Ill tell you. As long as the government is waging the war on drugs, in a poor manner I might add, society wont. Society wont because it doesnt have to, the government takes care of it for us, so rather than discuss these issues with your child you can spend that time working, in order to pay the government to keep protecting your child for you. The problem with government intervention, stretching past drugs, is that the government is not a community, it is a large beaurocratic mess of forms, protocols, and so on. The reason for this is nothing more than the simple fact that the government tries to deal with everyone at the same time. What works in Peoria, Illinois on Tuesday may not work for Winder, Georgia on Wednesday. The government looks at us as a series of numbers and statistics and then they create the laws and regulations designed to effect the greatest number of people, or the majority. When the anomalies pop up into the equation, more structures and regulations are added to try and accommodate the new statistics. Lets take a look at how this would work in a classroom. The exercise is simple using just the first initial and last name of each of the students in a random class, as well as their social security numbers and the grades that they have received over the course of the current school year, divide the class into three groups. Every group is to write an evaluation of the study habits, and general scholastic performance of every student. Using that information, design a system to improve the class. Next, put all of this information together and try and apply it to the rest of the school, and then apply it to the entire school system. Now this is a very simplistic exercise and I acknowledge the fact that the drug problem is more complex, but this serves as an example of what happens when the government tries to use regulations to deal with a social problem. First of all, the information consists of nothing but numbers. The information tells nothing of whether a student was sick on the week he received a zero on a test, or what was happening in their private lives that could effect the grades received for a particular assignment. There are thousands of unique factors that contribute to each and every students individual performance. To try and look at just numbers and try to regulate behavior based on that information is not only a Herculean task, but also it is an almost impossible mission to accomplish. The sheer manpower that such an endeavor would take gathering the information, collating, processing, analyzing, modifying, and then turning it over to a committee to decide how it is all going to be used is a never ending task. Youd have a better chance of gathering an infinite number of monkeys to write all of Shakespeares works, and It would take less time for the monkeys. (Haha) You can start to see the ineffectiveness of a large beauracracy trying to deal with problems that are so obviously needed to be dealt with by our social communities, in turn, social problems. Now if you asked the instructor of a class to summarize the scholastic performance of each of their students, chances are they are going to be able to tell you things. For example, when the student was sick, or whether or not they had difficulty understanding a particular segment or assignment, but otherwise do fine in class. Now ask that instructor what they would do to improve their classroom. It will probably work for that classroom or society if you will. Say for instance there is a window that opens onto a playground and the teacher says that a set of blinds to keep the kids from being distracted would improve class performance. Does that mean that all classrooms should have blinds on their windows? With marijuana, the problem is essentially the same. If you look at all of the kids who smoke marijuana as individuals you will see that the reasons and motivations for their use numbers in the thousands. You have peer pressure, escapism, or just simple experimentation and these are just a few to name. Later on, take a piece of paper and make a list of reasons for using drugs, such as marijuana. Not your reasons, just the reasons that anybody may feel at a given time. Now, similar to the first exercise, try and make a regulation that covers all of the reasons why abuse runs rampant. Now remember, these are the reasons you came up with, there are now 259 million other Americans with their own list of reasons why. You get the idea that the task on hand is an overwhelming one at the least. It is something that the government, any government anywhere, could never ever accomplish. This brings us back to the main thrust of this paper. Legalization of marijuana like any other social problem is just that a social problem. And as a social problem, it is best dealt with within a society. Societies that consist of people who know you, care for you, and even love you. Given the chance, we as a people will in fact work out these and any other problems that we, as a society, and individuals are confronted with in our daily existence.
Thursday, February 27, 2020
The Changes in Healthcare Industry Research Paper
The Changes in Healthcare Industry - Research Paper Example This paper explores the changes that the healthcare industry has experienced in the last decade and also assesses possible challenges the industry is likely to face in the next ten years. It is no secret that the healthcare industry has undergone an extensive change in the previous decade. The healthcare industry has in the last ten years experienced numerous ups and downs. The life expectancy of individuals has increased amazing compared to that in 1980s. There have been numerous medical breakthroughs both in terms of health equipment and drugs. The advancement in technology has seen health care delivery services become better each year, increasing the overall efficiency of the healthcare industry. The healthcare industry has grown from less efficient to the efficient industry through technological innovations. Computers have resulted in a massive reduction in medical errors. Health records are now processed and stored in electronic form eliminating massive paperwork and minimizing possible errors altogether. Competition has also heightened in the last decade pushing health care providers to fine-tune the services they offer to clients (Ginsburg, 2005). However, the industry has not been without its downs. The cost of health care has escalated over the years. It is now more expensive to obtain quality health care than it was ten years ago. The increasing number of uninsured indicates how expensive health care has become. Healthcare has become evidently unaffordable to many people over the last decade. Nonetheless, the government has been doing its best to curb this undesirable scenario. For instance, Obama care, though faced with numerous challenges, is aimed at making health care affordable to all people. Healthcare industry is likely to experience numerous changes in the next decade. Of all the likely changes, improvement in technology stands to be the biggest change in the next ten years. The advancement in technology has been on the positive side and the healthcare industry is likely to benefit from this in the next decade.Ã Ã
Monday, February 10, 2020
Mothering and Child Death Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words
Mothering and Child Death - Essay Example The region has experienced child deaths due to a variety of reasons. For example, Nations and Rebhun (1988) assert that it is caused by failure to obtain medical care for severely ill children. Other reasons such as the bureaucratic and geographic barriers also play a factor. The following paper seeks to examine the situation according to two different points of view. The two different points of view are brought forward by two sets of authors through the writing and research that was undertaken in the region. The paper looks at the key arguments that are made by each set of authors. Secondly, an analysis of the political, economic concerns that factor in each of the authorââ¬â¢s reasons for the child death. Finally, the biggest points of contention between the two works as well as any points to which the two sets of authors. More than 1 million Brazilian children under the age of 5 years die each year mostly as a result of parasitic infections interacting with infectious disease and a chronic case of under nutrition. According to Scheper-Hughes (1985), infant and childhood mortality in the region and other third world countries is a problem of political economy. However, he asserts and brings out another point to the table. Scheper-Hughes (1985) states that maternal detachment and an indifference towards the infants and the babies that are judged to be too weak or too vulnerable to survive the unhealthy and bad conditions of the shanty town living. The author tries to show the link between the economic and the maternal deprivation between the maternal and the emotional scarcity. The author also brings forward the social and the economic context shaping the expression of maternal sentiments and the cultural meaning or implications of mother love and child death. The author also describes the experiences of attachment, separation, and loss. The author undertakes a research study with 72 women who have a
Friday, January 31, 2020
Organizational Structure of a Hospital You Know Essay Example for Free
Organizational Structure of a Hospital You Know Essay INTRODUCTION: For this assignment Iââ¬â¢m choosing, Fortis Hospital at Noida, India and Krishna Nursing home at Chitradurga, Karnataka India. Fortis hospital at Noida, India is a part of Fortis healthcare group and mainly focuses on orthopaedics and neurosciences. Itââ¬â¢s a medium sized hospital with 300 bedded facilities and about 250 full time staff. Its organisational structure has low vertical and high horizontal distribution. THE HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION is as follows, 1) 37 medical departments which covers different specialities.2) Other departments such as HR, marketing, finance, engineering and nursing. 3) Social specialisation, example doctors.4) Functional specialisation, example technicians and nurses. VERTICAL STRUCTURE is as follows, 1) Zonal director at the top. 2) 43 departmental heads who work under Zonal director. 3) There is team under each department which report to departmental heads. Organizational structure of fortis hospital ZONAL DIRECTOR United HR medical director Head eng marketing sales Finance head Nursing matron Team Hr Doctors Eng team Marketing team Finance team Nursing team Centralisation: Head of department control all departments and they report to the Zonal director. Each individual in the organisation has limited autonomy and financially it is highly centralised and functionally it is moderately decentralised and it has high level of standardisation of administrative task and the recruitment process is very much formalised, whereas doctors have low level of formalisation and everyone follow standard operating procedure. Hence in summary, Fortis hospital is multi-speciality hospital of medium size and its structure has high horizontal complexity but low vertical complexity and it is moderately formalised and there is not much direct impact on centralisation and has moderately flexible structure and decision making is highly formalised and moderately decentralised at operational level.(http://www.hindubusinessline.com; www.fortishealthcare.com; www.hoovers.com) In contrast to the above mentioned complex structure second mentioned hospital is Krishna Nursing Home which is a small 50 bedded multispecialty hospital with a simple structure with the director at the top who is in charge of everything and there are heads of recruitment, finance and medical director who report to the director. It is mainly a vertical structure with director who has full decision making power, hence the structure has minimum decentralisation. The other staff has no autonomy.This hospital works basically on loyalty and trust and personal relationship and caters to a small population in the village Chitradurga, India. This structure is compatible with small hospitals like this. But disadvantage is that it is highly dependent on the director and is individual centric (www.healthcaremagic.com) If we compare the 2 structure in relation to, 1) Central Peripheral relations: Fortis is much bigger hospital and has separate division for each department and there is decentralisation and semi-autonomy for each department and the purchaser and provider divisions are separate. Whereas Krishna Nursing Home has no decentralisation and no autonomy for the departments and all decisions are taken by the director. 2) Links with other organisational groups: Fortis has links and tie-ups with many other smaller hospitals which refer cases to them and also has link ups with various insurance companies. Whereas Krishna Nursing Home has no tie-ups with any other hospitals and works alone and caters to a small population. 3) Internal structure: Hierarchy, as mentioned above Fortis hospital has minimal vertical but complex horizontal distribution of power so it has a flatter organisational shape which helps in effective communication and decision making and has widened collaborative links between various departments and divisions resulting in internal linking and average spans of control whereas Krishna Nursing Home has vertical structure and is fully hierarchical based and there is no internal linking between departments (Merson et.,al, 2006). CONCLUSION: Both these hospitals has completely different organisational structure but both are successful because the targeted population for both are different. While, Fortis targets higher and wider range of population and focuses on specialised services, hence has complex organisational structure. Whereas Krishna Nursing Home caters to a small population andà provides basic services and hence has a simple vertical hierarchical structure. REFERENCES: ââ¬ËFortis Healthcare signs pact with US hospitalââ¬â¢ online. Available at: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/businessline/2000/10/18/stories/021851e 3.htm. (Accessed on 7 January 2013) Krishna Nursing Home (online). Available at: www.healthcaremagic.com (Accessed on 8 January 2013). Merson et.,al (2006) ââ¬ËInternational Public Healthââ¬â¢, 2nd Edition, Jones and Bartlett publishers, pp;558-593. (online) Available at: www. Fortishealthcare.com.(Accessed on: 7 January 2013). (online) Available at: www.hoovers.com (Accessed on: 7 January 2013).
Wednesday, January 22, 2020
Media Violence Against Women Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive Topics
Media Violence Against Women à à à à In the United States, as well as throughout the majority of the world, people are bombarded with information on a daily basis.à The majority of the information that it seen or heard is a direct result of someoneà aiming the information at the masses.à Whether it is a company that would like us to buy it's product, or a newspaper that would have us believe a certain "fact" that they are reporting, someone has decided how the information will be presented.à This notion brings me to the issue of how our society perpetuates violence against women through the use of the media and television shows.à I would argue that, because we are socialized on a daily basis to believe certain ideas, this same process contributes to the violence aimed toward women.à This encompasses the concept that impressionable young men may remain unaware of the impact of this violence by the omission of certain facts from news articles.à It is also important toà see how the medi a contributes to the way in which the abused women see their role in the "creation" of this violence.à Furthermore, I would reason that these media outlets create a certain type of apathy in our society that has caused many people to either blame the victim, or just turn their heads and consider domestic violence a "family" problem, thus ignoring the legal ramifications altogether. This area must be understood in order to determine how the distortion of the ideas that are being expressed, through the use of television and magazines, are directly related to the societal values being represented. à à à à The first issue that I would like to analyze is how we as a society encourage violence against women.à Images flow into our homes everyday th... ...ved from our own lives.à Only then can we decided whether these portrayals are in fact the truth, or just more rhetoric being feed to us from the patriarchal view point of modern media outlets. à à Works Cited à à Berns, Nancy.à "My Problem and -How I Solved it: Domestic Violence in Women's Magazines". Sociology à à à à à Quarterly. 40 (Winter 1999) : 85-109 Carmody, Dianne Cyr.à Entertaining Violence. New York 1998. "Mixed Messages: Images of Domestic Violence à à à à à à à on "Reality " Television.à à Ed. Mark Fishman and Gray Cavander.à Aldine De Gruyter Lemmey, Dorothy.à "Collective Silence for Collective Violence".à <1999 http//www.Feminista.com/ à à à à à à à v1n12/lemmey.html : 1-6> Roland, John.à "Additional Amendments to the Constitution". <http://www.constitution.org/cons/afterten.htm> à à Ã
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)